Milly Alcock Shines While Supergirl Struggles

Rating: 2 out of 5.

Supergirl fan screening provided by Universal Pictures

When James Gunn and Peter Safran were tasked with reinvigorating the DC Universe, it was clear that a shakeup involving culling star faces like Henry Cavill, Gal Gadot and Jason Momoa (to name a few) heralded a no nonsense approach to this task. Of course, actors out-age the characters they play, and Gunn’s first film in this new phase of the DC Universe, Superman (2025), replaced one of the staple names of that universe in Cavill.

The second DC film to be released in this new phase, Supergirl (2026) never had to face that Cavill-ier sized backlash given this was the first mainline Supergirl movie. While Gunn isn’t at the helm this time around, his fingerprints are all over Craig Gillespe’s film, a director known for more measured character studies rather than big budget blockbusters. It’s easy to see why Gillespe was viewed as the right man for this job though: films like I, Tonya (2017) and Cruella (2021) follow the origin story of strong female characters and see them manifest into something larger than life that they never saw in themselves to begin with. Naturally, that makes Supergirl a super candidate for a director like Gillespe.

While that is the case to an extent this time around, Gunn’s said fingerprints have left smudges on Kara Zor-El / Supergirl (Milly Alcock), keeping her feeling like she’s being held back by kryptonite —poor writing, drab subplots and a one dimensional villain — rather than allowed to charge up and shine in a similar way to David Corenswet’s Superman.

Opening with a scene involving a family being slaughtered by chief movie villain Krem (Matthias Schoenaerts), lone survivor Ruthye (Eve Ridley) is left wanting revenge for their murder. She soon finds Kara drinking away in one of her pub crawls, with the duo eventually teaming up after Kara’s dog Krypto, is poisoned by Krem as he steals her ship and flys off. If this sounds like a sort of pseudo-revenge John Wick dog movie, you’re bang on the money. But revenge isn’t what Ruthye should be seeking, or so Kara tries to hammer into her. There’s more to life than revenge, Kara goes on, so let me handle this…oh wait you didn’t listen to me and now we’re on a buddy up adventure involving Marvel like one-liners and less than flashy CGI.

Jason Momoa as Lobo in Supergirl

It’s telling that in reinvigorating DC, Gunn has done a control c, control v approach to these first two films. While I can’t blame him for utlising a tried and true formula that (really) he put in motion with Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) —for better and worse— it reduces the film to a predictable, beat-by-beat exercise where Supergirl could be replaced by Wonder Woman and you wouldn’t bat an eyelid.

Milly Alcock does as much as she can with a script that washes over any stakes with a shrug of the shoulder and cheeky wink. Krem is about as one-dimensional a superhero villain as they come, right up there with Christian Bale’s Gorr. His motives are unclear, as he steals swords and young women who he wants to wed off in some sense like he’s Immortan Joe from Mad Max: Fury Road (2015).

The plot is as much tied to Ruthye’s character as it is to Kara, and it leaves a lot to be desired in the way of character development and a reason to care about what is happening to these people. There’s flashbacks to Kara’s home planet, giving us a different perspective to the fall of Krypton that we’ve always gotten in a Superman film. It’s welcome and makes sense for a character we haven’t seen much of on the big screen, but it leaves the moments in the present feeling short lived. Jason Momoa jets around as Lobo on a motorcycle, having as much fun as he can while scoffing down bears and revving the engine (not far from what he does in real life), and some of the action is serviceable, but beyond that this feels like a set up to an inevitable Superman and Supergirl movie at some point.

Ultimately, Gillespe’s film chooses to look forward and remind audiences that Supergirl will be a part of a wider Justice League at some point rather than giving her an origin story worth its weight. 

Supergirl opens nationally from today.

Superman: James Gunn Marvel-ises Superman, for Better and Worse

Rating: 3 out of 5.

Superman preview screening provided by Universal Pictures

When Guardians of the Galaxy (2014) hit screens some eleven years ago, there was a shift in the superhero movie paradigm that up until then was often focused on darker stories and more mature themes, most of which went hard on action but stepped away from the jovial playfulness that animated shows often captured so well. That shift is owed in large part to James Gunn who managed to find a nice middle ground between getting you your dose of power ups and battle scenes with the humanity and flaws behind these heroes. He also (unintentionally) set off a chain of events for superhero films that would see them sway too much towards silliness and cheesy one-liners that they eventually became devoid of any uniqueness or balance.

In the time since his original Guardians film, Gunn has gone onto deliver two more for Marvel before being headed up as Co-chairman and Co-CEO of DC Studios in a bid to try and turn the tide DC’s way — after all, their catalogue of heroes is much stronger than that of Marvels. While The Suicide Squad (2021) represented his first real foray into the DC universe, it’s his long awaited reinvention of Superman (2025) that has felt like the true starting point that is supposed to set the tone for what is to come.

To do so, Gunn has opted to throw the whole ‘origin story’ approach out the window and instead, throw viewers right into the thick of things. Superman (a perfectly cast David Corenswet) is three years into his Superman reveal, with all of the crash landing and coming-to-terms-with-his-powers backstory, left implied. It’s a bold choice from Gunn but it makes sense as it gives him the room to cram more into the plot rather than tread old ground.

Whether the cramming tickles your fancy or not, is another question. There’s a lot going on in Gunn’s film, much to the detriment of building out a cohesive plot. Gunn is at once interested in diving into the humanity behind the God figure and hitting him with countless obstacles and side quests, with the result being glimmers of deeper interrogation —one occurring early on as Superman in his Clark Kent guise, chats with his fellow reporter girlfriend Lois Lane (an equally fitting Rachel Brosnahanin) in an impromptu interview— but an overall surface level exercise.

(L to r) NICHOLAS HOULT as Lex Luthor and DAVID CORENSWET as Superman in Warner Bros. Pictures’ “SUPERMAN”

And that’s before we start talking about the wider plot which includes Lex Luthor (Nicholas Hoult) trying to get dirt on Superman so he has justification to kill him, a trio of ‘Justice Gang’ sub-heroes who pop in every now and then to aid Superman and (really) fill-in during his absence, a weird middle-eastern conflict that threatens to boil over but that Superman is embroiled in, and a wonky love-story between Luthor’s side-piece and a a journo helping to get dirt on Luthor. In other words, it’s a stuffy room with little air left to breathe, which at best gets you a little laugh and at worst, an eye roll.

But while Gunn might not be focusing on Superman’s origin story, he’s definitely focusing on his own, taking his learning’s from his time at Marvel and Marvel-ising them here. No one can accuse Gunn of making something that’s boring, after all, the ethos of Superman has always been built around a level of silliness and charm that starts right from his vibrant, cartoonish costume. Gunn understands that in order to make this version of Superman any different from past iterations, he would have to cut the preamble and focus on the wonder that comes from seeing frost breath, laser eyes and flying while keeping it as lighthearted as possible — keep the message simple and ensure the goofiness is there, even if the stakes never feel like they match up.

I have to admit, while I’m not a Zack Snyder shill, I appreciate the darker tones and comic-book wham’s and pow’s he brought to Man of Steel (2013), Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (2016) and his version of the Justice League (2021). Gunn’s version has gone a completely different direction and I can respect the decision to do so since the other approach wasn’t putting bums in cinema seats. Whether or not this film sets the tone for this new DC universe though, is hard to tell, especially with Matt Reeves’ The Batman (2022) feeling more akin to what would have existed in the old universe (I’m sure we’ll see Cornswet’s Superman and Robert Pattinson’s Batman cross paths in some way — though I smell tonal whiplash from a mile away). Regardless, Superman is imbued with the same level of goofiness as Gunn’s other films, and while it probably would have felt fresher had it been released eleven years ago, it still packs an entertaining punch.

Superman opens nationally from July 10.